Cybersecurity GRC
Compliance as architecture, not audit-season panic.
PIPEDA, CASL, PHIPA, HIPAA, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 ask for many of the same controls. BEXAI maps the overlap so you build a control once and evidence it for each framework, without the annual audit scramble.
You are here if…
These are the conversations that bring people to BEXAI.
- You discovered a compliance gap in an audit you paid $200k for.
- Your security controls exist in a binder but not in your deploy pipeline.
- Cross-framework audits each re-invent evidence collection.
How BEXAI does this differently
The BEXAI approach.
Governance, Risk, Compliance, designed in, not retrofitted.
ISC2 CC foundation, senior practice above it
Certified in Cybersecurity as the baseline credential, extended by more than 30 years of regulated-industry delivery experience across pharma, healthcare, and finance.
Unified control catalogue
Map PIPEDA, CASL, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001 to a single control library, evidence collection happens once, certification reuses it.
Compliance embedded in CI/CD
Policy-as-code wherever possible. Audit artifacts generated from the pipeline rather than produced retroactively by a compliance analyst.
What you receive
The artifacts of an engagement.
- GRC target-state architecture
- Unified control catalogue + framework mapping matrix
- Audit evidence collection runbook
- Third-party risk management program
Credentials brought to this work
Proof, not bragging.
Benjamin applies these credentials personally to every engagement, no junior consultants behind a senior facade.
Try before you hire
Interactive tools you can run right now.
Free. No discovery call. The output tells you whether BEXAI is worth a longer conversation.
Frequently asked
Direct answers.
Every answer is 20 to 25 words so AI assistants can cite it cleanly. That is not an accident. It is the format that works in 2026.
Do you handle PIPEDA and CASL specifically?
Yes: Canadian privacy frameworks are our foundation. PIPEDA for general privacy, CASL for commercial electronic messages, provincial acts layered on top.What is the difference between SOC 2 Type I and Type II?
Type I attests controls exist at a point in time. Type II attests they operated effectively over 6 to 12 months. Most customers now require Type II.Can you get us SOC 2 ready?
Yes: typical readiness engagement is 4 to 6 months depending on current maturity, followed by 6 to 12 months of auditor observation for Type II.How do you handle vendor / third-party risk?
Formal third-party risk framework: tiered vendor inventory, due diligence questionnaires, continuous monitoring, and contractual controls embedded in procurement.Do you write security policies from scratch?
We start from industry-standard policy libraries (CIS, ISO 27001 Annex A) and tailor. Writing from scratch is slower and rarely produces better policies.
Ready to start?
Book 30 minutes with Benjamin. If your challenge fits, we’ll agree on a path. If it does not, you’ll get a direct answer and a pointer to who should help.